Skip to main content

Potential of Garra rufa as a novel high-temperature resistant model fish: a review on current and future approaches

Abstract

Garra rufa, commonly known as the “doctor fish”, is a freshwater cyprinid native to warm regions of the Middle East. Since the late twentieth century, it has been widely utilized in spas for alternative therapeutics and fish pedicures (or manicures) for dermatological diseases such as psoriasis and eczema. Owing to its unique characteristics, there is growing interest in exploring various applications of G. rufa. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the phylogenetic position, ecology, biological characteristics, and breeding methods of G. rufa, and provides insights into its use as a therapeutic fish. Notably, the ability of G. rufa to thrive in high-temperature environments exceeding 37 °C distinguishes it from other cyprinids and suggests its potential as a model for human diseases, such as human infectious diseases, and in use in cancer xenograft models for high-throughput drug screening. The ongoing genome sequencing project for G. rufa aims to elucidate the mechanisms underlying its high-temperature tolerance and offers valuable genomic resources. These efforts have resulted in significant advances in fish aquaculture, species conservation, and biomedical research.

Introduction

Garra rufa (Heckel, 1843), commonly known as the “doctor fish” or red garra, is a small freshwater teleost fish (usually less than 15 cm in length and 40 g in weight) that is native to rivers, streams, and lakes in the Middle Eastern regions, including Türkiye, Syria, Iraq, and Iran. It belongs to the family Cyprinidae, which is a large family with more than 150 species, including other carp-related species, such as zebrafish and goldfish [1]. Over the past two decades, over 40 new species have been discovered in Garra. As of 31 March 2024, the academic database Web of Science (https://www.webofscience.com/) listed 302 articles under the topic heading “Garra.” Of these, 223 articles specifically reported on Garra fish, while the remaining papers focused on subjects such as the "Garra rufa optimization-assisted deep learning model,” or contained minimal references to Garra fish in their content. Of these 223 articles, 56 articles (approximately 25%) focused on G. rufa, highlighting its significance as the most-studied species within the genus. The second most researched species were G. lamta and G. barreimiae, each with nine papers (approximately 4%).

The biological characteristics of G. rufa are fascinating and contribute to its unique role in biotherapy in natural ecosystems and human therapeutic practices. The fish are known for their unique behavior of feeding on dead keratinized cells of human skin, an activity popularly referred to as fish pedicure or ichthyotherapy, which has made these fish popular in the tourism and health industries as natural solutions for acne, psoriasis, and eczema [2,3,4].

Their resilience in degraded river environments, tolerance to high temperatures, which enables them to thrive at spa water temperatures, and omnivorous diet, which includes algae, detritus, small animals, and dead human skin, are believed to facilitate habitat expansion. Originating in the Middle East, G. rufa has been transported to various regions for ichthyotherapy to treat skin diseases, leading to some populations becoming invasive [5].

This review summarizes recent insights from research on G. rufa, covering its geographical distribution, habitat, culture, diseases, and therapeutic applications. In addition, we highlight the potential of G. rufa as a novel animal model in human disease research, extending beyond its traditional role in ichthyotherapy. This potential is largely attributed to its high-temperature resistance, suggesting that G. rufa could serve as a novel small-fish model alongside zebrafish and medaka.

Phylogenetic relationship between G. rufa and other small teleost fish

Teleosts are a large group of Actinopterygii (ray-finned fish) characterized by a specific genome structure resulting from teleost-specific third-round whole-genome duplication (Ts3R), which could contribute to their evolutionary success[6,7,8,9] (Fig. 1). Small teleost fish are used widely in biomedical research because of their high experimental throughput, their closer genetic proximity to humans than invertebrate model organisms such as Drosophila and nematodes, and the relatively lower ethical barriers to their experimental use compared to those for mammalian models, such as mice [10,11,12]. Each small teleost fish model has its own characteristics; zebrafish (Danio rerio) and medaka (Oryzias latipes) are relatively easy to manipulate genetically [13,14,15,16], goldfish (Carassius auratus) has undergone a recent whole-genome duplication (Cs4R) [17,18,19], the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) allows for the analysis of complex social behavior [20], and the African turquoise killifish (Nothobranchius furzeri) serves as a unique model for studying aging [21].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Phylogenetic relationship between humans, G. rufa, and other model organisms. The phylogenetic relationships between humans, G. rufa, and other common vertebrate model animals, and amphioxus are illustrated. The common and scientific names of each animal are displayed to the right of each animal silhouette, and further to the right, a brief description of the characteristics of each animal as a model organism is provided. The topology of the cladogram is based on previous studies [22, 23]. WGD, whole-genome duplication; 1R/2R, first and second rounds of WGD; Ts3R, teleost-specific third-round WGD; Cs4R, common carp and goldfish-specific fourth round WGD [17,18,19]. Animal silhouettes are from PhyloPic (www.phylopic.org)

G. rufa belongs to the Cyprinidae family and is similar to zebrafish and goldfish. The taxonomy of the subfamilies within the family Cyprinidae is debated, with the number reported of subfamilies varying depending on the study. Subfamilies such as Danioninae, Cyprininae, Labeoninae, and Barbinae have been defined; however, consensus has not yet been reached on their phylogenetic relationships [22, 24,25,26]. A recent mitochondrial genome analysis showed that G. rufa belongs to the Labeoninae subfamily within the family Cyprinidae, along with the mud carp (Cirrhinus molitorella) and rohu (Labeo rohita) [23]. In addition to G. rufa, the genus Garra includes several additional species, such as G. jordanica, G. ghorensis, and G. nana [27, 28]. Through mitochondrial DNA analyses, they have been shown to be genetically differentiated based on their geographical distribution [27,28,29].

Traits of G. rufa

Appearance

G. rufa is relatively small, measuring approximately 15 cm in length when fully grown [30]. They reach sexual maturity at the age of one year [31]. In natural habitats, spawning occurs from May to August. They generally exhibit a grayish-brown hue, which helps them to blend into their natural riverbed environments (Fig. 2a and b). Their bodies may display subtle patterns or markings, and may have a paler underbelly. G. rufa has a broad head and an elongated body that tapers towards its tail. They have rounded fins, including a dorsal fin set midway along the back and a rounded tail fin (Fig. 2a and b). Their scales are small and tightly fitted, giving them a smooth texture; the scales take seven distinct shapes, and otoliths take three different forms [32]. An adhesive disk or organ near the mouth is positioned on the lower part of the fish (Fig. 2c and d). Fish can readily locate and eat their feed using their ventrally positioned mouth because of the sticky disc located on the bottom lip, which is used to attach to habitat surfaces, including rocks and stones [33]. This anatomical feature allows G. rufa to adhere to human skin and feed on dead keratinocytes (Fig. 2e).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Gross appearance of G. rufa. a-b Gross appearance of an adult (a) and young (b) G. rufa. (c) Lateral view of mouth of adult G. rufa. (d) Frontal view of young mouth. The mouth (black arrows) in G. rufa has the additional function to adhere to bottom surfaces and to scoop up food particles. (e) G. rufa engaging in ichthyotherapy

Habitat

G. rufa is found in many freshwater streams in the Asi, Tigris-Euphrates, Ceyhan, and Seyhan rivers in Türkiye, as well as in freshwater bodies in Syria, Iraq, Iran, and Jordan [34, 35]. Fish thrive in these river basins because of the suitable climatic and water conditions, including warm and slightly mineralized waters. G. rufa is a benthic fish that prefers shallow, fast-moving, warm waters with rocky or sandy bottoms conducive to its feeding habits. The native environments of different Garra species differ in several ways. For example, G. rufa is dominant in turbid, large, and relatively deep streams, whereas G. rezai is dominant in clear, shallow, and small streams. In the Tigris–Euphrates River, which is the natural habitat of G. rufa, other Garra species are present, such as G. rezai and G. variabilis, which are very similar in external anatomy and are genetically closely related [36]. Therefore, in addition to phenotypic characteristics, analyses using genomic and mitochondrial DNA are important for identifying Garra species.

Breeding

The population of G. rufa in their natural habitats is insufficient to meet the demand for ichthyotherapy and other purposes, putting pressure on their natural stocks [37]. Habitat degradation caused by climate change, anthropogenic activities, and increased pollution levels in aquatic environments also affects G. rufa populations [38, 39]. Therefore, the cultivation of G. rufa is important for protecting populations and creating a future for sustainable environments.

Water temperature is a critical factor in aquaculture. Generally, G. rufa is resistant to both low (3–7 °C) and high (38–43 °C) temperatures, and thus their thermal tolerance polygon values are high [40]; the Kangal Fish Spring in Türkiye, one of the natural habitats of this fish, has average water temperatures of 35 °C [4]. This is a significant advantage for cultivating G. rufa in tropical regions. However, to maintain G. rufa cultivation, sudden and frequent temperature changes should be avoided [40]. Sudden water temperature changes in aquaculture can result in water quality deterioration, hypoxia, nutritional abnormalities, parasitic infections, and bacterial or fungal pathogens.

G. rufa can be reared in environments of varying sizes. On the larger end, G. rufa can be kept in large tanks with a depth of several tens of centimeters and dimensions from 1 to 2 m, which mimic their natural habitat. However, based on our experience, it is also feasible to maintain them in small-scale laboratory settings. For instance, we house 5–10 young G. rufa (~ 6 mpf) individuals in standard 2 L zebrafish tanks with no signs of aggressive or abnormal behavior. As G. rufa matures, reaching an adult body length of approximately 10 cm, it is preferable to rear them in standard 360 L tanks (100 cm × 60 cm × 60 cm). As G. rufa is a bottom-dwelling fish in natural environments, tanks with large bottom areas are considered ideal.

To date, few studies have been conducted on G. rufa culture, and the optimal conditions for its cultivation are gradually being defined [31, 41]. The fertilized eggs of G. rufa are non-adhesive, sink to the bottom of the tank, and must be promptly relocated to prevent the parent fish from eating them. The eggs can be sterilized prior to incubation by immersion in 5 mg/L methylene blue for 40–60 min. The spawning frequency of G. rufa is once every 15–30 days, with 57–314 eggs produced with an average diameter of 2.83 mm. When the fish were spawned in aquariums at water temperatures of 28 °C, 85–90% of the eggs hatched in 35 h, larvae opened their mouths in three days and started feeding exogenously, and began swimming by the fourth day post-hatching. Additionally, the larval stage of this species lasts approximately 15 days in water with temperature ranges between 24 °C and 32 °C.

Although phytoplankton are the primary food source of G. rufa, these fish also receive nutrients from bacteria and zooplankton in their native habitat [42]. Compared with zebrafish, G. rufa consumes a higher amount of feed (3.2% of their body weight per day) [31]. This indicates that G. rufa has high metabolic activity, which may contribute to survival in high-temperature environments.

Diseases

Infectious diseases are among the most significant yet manageable diseases affecting G. rufa. Among parasites, Clinostomum complanatum has been reported to infect G. rufa in freshwater in Türkiye [43], whereas Paradiplozoon bingolensis has been reported to infect G. rufa in the Göynük River in Türkiye [44]. Pathogenic bacteria such as Aeromonas sobria [45] cause significant damage to G. rufa during cultivation and trade. Pathogens introduced from the natural environment into aquaculture facilities can cause mortality, growth retardation, and decreased feed conversion rates in cultured fish, making proper quarantine essential. In G. rufa aquaculture, the use of sedative and anesthetic substances such as clove oil and 2-phenoxyethanol is recommended to reduce stress during transportation, parasite inspection, and other critical routine farming operations [46, 47].

Conventional roles of G. rufa in human society

G. rufa as “doctor fish”

G. rufa, which has gained international recognition as the “doctor fish,” makes a unique contribution to the treatment of skin disorders, particularly psoriasis. This natural exfoliation process, often referred to as “ichthyotherapy,” involves patients immersing affected areas of their skin in water basins containing G. rufa (Fig. 2e). The fish then feed on the dead skin, providing a therapeutic benefit. The use of the “doctor fish” as a complementary treatment for skin conditions is based on the ability of the fish to exfoliate, potentially improving the overall health of the skin. Patients with psoriasis, a chronic autoimmune skin condition characterized by red, flaky, and crusty patches of skin covered with silvery scales, have reported significant relief and reduction in symptoms following treatment with G. rufa [2, 48, 49]. However, it is important to note that, although many individuals have experienced positive outcomes from ichthyotherapy, this practice should be considered a complementary approach rather than a standalone treatment. The scientific community continues to study the extent of its benefits and the underlying mechanisms.

Although ichthyotherapy with G. rufa offers some benefits, it also poses some challenges. Concerns regarding the potential transmission of infections from these fish have escalated since 2000. Volpe et al. reported that multiple pathogens were present in both fish and humans [50, 51]. Notably, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus [52] and Mycobacterium marinum infections [53] following ichthyotherapy have been documented. Various types of bacteria (Aeromonas spp., Vibrio spp., P. aeruginosa, and Mycobacterium spp.) have been detected in fish spa ponds, which may have originated from water, fish, or humans [45]. During fish therapy, the water containing the fish can transmit infections from one person to another. However, the transmission of the infection through contaminated water to healthy individuals is limited to hand and foot fish spas [54]. The sanitary conditions of the water and the health status of the fish are critical for ensuring the safety and efficacy of treatment, including the use of certain water disinfectants [55].

Despite these concerns, the use of G. rufa in the treatment of skin diseases remains a topic of interest for dermatologists and patients seeking alternative or complementary therapies. As research advances, a clearer understanding of the benefits, limitations, and best practices associated with ichthyotherapy may emerge, potentially solidifying its application in the broader context of dermatological treatment.

G. rufa as ornamental fish

Ornamental fish are bred and maintained primarily for their aesthetic appeal, often in aquariums or artificial ponds. Examples include goldfish (Carassius auratus), common carp (Cyprinus carpio), medaka (Oryzias latipes), betta fish (Betta splendens), and various tropical fish species. The annual turnover of ornamental fisheries, which generates up to $15 billion in revenue, is an important commercial activity supporting one of the most popular leisure activities worldwide [56]. Ornamental fish often exhibit unique phenotypes, such as diverse body colors and shapes. Studying the molecular mechanisms underlying these phenotypes in ornamental fish can provide insights into the fundamental biological principles of vertebrates, highlighting their value as experimental models [17, 19, 57,58,59].

The Garra species G. lissorhynchus, G. spilota, G. culiciphaga, and G. rufa are also known as ornamental or aquarium fish (www.aquariumglaser.de). Although G. rufa are bottom-dwelling fish, they are beneficial to breeders and are preferred by many aquarists because they help control algae and accumulation of excess feed in aquariums. G. rufa is imported and utilized in many countries. Many are cultured in Indonesia [54, 60], with active cultivation on the island of Java. Producers also trade this fish in marketplaces from East to West Java. Producers from West Java offer lower prices than those from East Java. Most producers are from Bekasi. Online vendors sell G. rufa in the size range of 1–3 cm at a price range 0.06 of 0.19 USD.

G. rufa as human nutrition

G. rufa is also consumed by humans and is considered edible by the local people of Oman [61] and Türkiye [62, 63]. The flesh of G. rufa has been demonstrated to contain a high proportion of dietary fatty acids such as oleic acid (18:1ω9), eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5ω3), docosahexaenoic acid (22:6ω3), arachidonic acid (20:4n-6), omega 3 (n-3)/omega 6 (n-6), and total monounsaturated fatty acids [64]. Seasonal variation in water temperature and feed composition affect total lipid and fatty acid content [64]. These fatty acids promote human health by improving dyslipidemia, preventing thrombosis, and exerting neuroprotective effects. Therefore, G. rufa has potential not only as a simple source of calories, but also as a functional food. In addition, because of its ease of farming and high heat tolerance, G. rufa may become an important alternative food source for humans in the near future, as global warming progresses [65].

Emerging roles of G. rufa in human health care and medical research

Expansion of medical use as “doctor fish”

The medical and therapeutic applications of G. rufa, particularly in dermatology and alternative medicine, have broadened considerably. In addition to its well-documented use in the treatment of psoriasis, G. rufa is used to assist in the management of eczema and various dry skin conditions. The removal of dead skin layers potentially reduces discomfort and improves the efficacy of moisturizing treatments.

The potential of G. rufa in enhancing wound healing has garnered increasing interest. Although research is ongoing, it has been posited that these fish may aid in wound cleaning by eliminating dead skin, thereby lowering infection risk and accelerating the healing process. Notably, the saliva of G. rufa is believed to contain components that promote wound healing, including antimicrobial agents [3, 60]. Although these specific components have not yet been identified, similar beneficial substances, mainly antimicrobial peptides, have been detected in the skin and mucus of various fish species [66,67,68], suggesting the possibility of analogous compounds in G. rufa. This attribute may extend its medical applications beyond conventional dermatology. In addition, G. rufa treatment is associated with stress relief and benefits to mental well-being. The unique sensation of fish nibbling is often described as gentle tickling, which induces relaxation and enhances the overall spa experience. A clinical trial of ichthyotherapy for psoriasis at Kangal Hot Springs in Türkiye reported a reduction in patient stress and enhancement in psychological well-being [4]. This suggests that the therapy could be applicable not only to dermatological diseases but also to various stress-related illnesses and mental disorders.

Novel fish with high-temperature tolerance as a model organism for human disease

In recent years, with a global increase in animal welfare awareness and efforts to improve efficiency and reduce the costs of bioresearch, drug discovery, and safety testing, the use of mammalian animals in research has decreased [69]. As alternatives, the use of cultured cells, including induced pluripotent stem cells, predictive analysis using informatics and artificial intelligence, and test systems employing non-mammalian animals, such as fish, insects, and nematodes, has been increasing [70]. Fish are particularly important tools for understanding diseases and developing pharmaceuticals, because they as vertebrates they are more similar to humans than insects or nematodes, and share many organs in common with humans [71,72,73].

As genome sequencing projects and molecular analyses of teleosts have progressed, various small fish species, including zebrafish [10, 11, 73], medaka [74, 75], goldfish [17], and African turquoise killifish [76] have emerged as valuable model organisms for several research areas, such as toxicology, drug discovery, and human medicine and diseases. Despite the unique biological characteristics of each species, they share commonalities in cellular proliferation, cell cycle, cell division, apoptosis, and fundamental intracellular signaling pathways. These similarities make them excellent model organisms for exploring early development, organ formation, tissue regeneration, infections, and carcinogenesis, and occasionally as models for higher brain functions, such as neurobehavioral and learning capabilities [17, 72, 77, 78]. These small fish models, bolstered by global animal welfare movements, have rapidly gained popularity as alternatives to traditional rodent models such as mice and rats.

However, similar to their rodent counterparts, small fish models have certain limitations. In particular, the requirements of different optimal growth temperatures are often overlooked. Fish are ectothermic, which means that the concept of internally regulated body temperature does not apply to them in its strictest sense. Nevertheless, temperatures higher than normal have been reported to profoundly influence the function of many organs, cause damage to the liver [79,80,81] and adipose tissues [82] and enhance the immune response [83, 84]. In the field of cancer research, xenograft studies have actively pursued the transplantation of human-derived cancer cells into zebrafish to explore anticancer drugs, therapeutic targets, and mechanisms [85,86,87]. However, the viability of human-derived cancer cells coexisting with zebrafish in environments of up to 34 °C [88]—and not for extended periods—as true cancer cells, is highly questionable. Numerous reports have highlighted successful examples of human-derived cancer cell transplantation into zebrafish; however, few successes have been noted for deeper cancers, such as pancreatic and prostate cancers. In infectious disease research, small fish species are commonly used as models of human diseases caused by various infectious microorganisms. However, because microorganisms that infect humans generally thrive in environments at 37 °C, there is no strictly fish-based model that accurately replicates human infections [89,90,91]. Zebrafish are well-known models of tuberculosis. However, when the human pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis is introduced into zebrafish larvae, the bacterium can only be detected for nine days. As a substitute, another species from the Mycobacterium genus, M. marinum, has been used as a source of infection [92]. However, M. marinum rarely causes respiratory infections in humans, which limits its relevance in modeling human respiratory diseases.

Based on these findings, one of the significant challenges that fish face as model organisms for human diseases is their ability to thrive at high temperatures, such as at 37 °C, which is considered high for most fish species. In addition to G. rufa, a few fish, including arowanas and some African cichlids, grow at this temperature. Arowanas, which can reach approximately 1 m in adulthood and live for approximately 10 years, are challenging to manage in laboratory settings due to their size. African cichlids, typically reaching approximately 10 cm in adult size and known for brooding their fertilized eggs inside the mouths of females, are difficult to maintain in mixed-species tanks [93] and have been reported to grow normally only at temperatures up to 35 °C. In contrast, G. rufa demonstrates the most robust heat resistance among these species, and is known worldwide for its use as “doctor fish” in spas and hot springs (Table 1). Preliminary tests conducted by our team have shown that it can survive in environments as hot as 40 °C with no observable effect on locomotor activity. G. rufa is omnivorous, highly fertile, and reaches adult sizes of 10–15 cm, with juveniles measuring approximately 3 cm, suitable for use in laboratory research. Additionally, the diameter of fertilized eggs is approximately 3 mm, and they are transparent [41], which facilitates microinjections for genetic manipulation and chemical evaluation. Unfortunately, because the genome sequence of G. rufa is unknown, reports on its use as a human disease model are lacking. However, similar to zebrafish and medaka, G. rufa has the potential to be used as a model organism in medical biology. In addition, the transplantation of human-derived cancer cells, a task that is challenging to achieve in zebrafish, has been successfully demonstrated (data not shown). We believe that G. rufa could emerge as a new model organism for human disease research.

Table 1 The upper limit temperature to keep various fish

Genome sequencing of G. rufa

The limited availability of genomic resources for G. rufa hampers genetic manipulations and conduct comprehensive analyses of unique molecular pathways in the species. Recent advances in genome sequencing technology and bioinformatics [94], including long-read sequencing and high-throughput chromosome conformation capture analysis, have made chromosome-level whole-genome sequencing feasible for many organisms [95,96,97,98]. To date, 71 cyprinid genome assemblies have been registered in the National Center for Biotechnology Information genome database. Among these genome assemblies, 26 were located at the chromosomal level. The status of genome assemblies of fish belonging to the subfamily Labeoninae, to which G. rufa belongs, is detailed in Table 2. Within this subfamily, 11 genome assemblies have been reported, three of which–Labeo rohita (GCA_022985175.1), Cirrhinus molitorella (GCA_033026305.1), and Cirrhinus mrigala (GCA_036247105.1)–are at the chromosome level (Table 2).

Table 2 Publicly available genome assemblies in the Labeoninae subfamily

Cytological studies have determined the chromosome number of G. rufa to be 25 [34]. However, direct experimental estimates of the genome size of G. rufa are lacking. Given that the genome sizes of L. rohita (GenBank accession: GCA_022985175.1) and C. molitorella (GenBank accession: GCA_033026305.1), which belong to the same Labeoninae subfamily as G. rufa, have been reported to be approximately 1 Gb (Table 2), it is likely that the genome size of G. rufa is also approximately 1 Gb.

Transposable elements (TEs) are major components of non-coding regions in animal genomes [99,100,101,102]. Although the genome assembly of G. rufa has not yet been reported, the TE profiles of other Labeoninae genomes, such as those of L. rohita, C. molitorella, and C. mrigala, provide insights into the likely TE landscape of the G. rufa genome. In the L. rohita genome, 41.25% has been annotated as repetitive elements, with a notable abundance of LTR retrotransposons and DNA elements [103]. In the C. molitorella genome, repetitive elements account for 45.18% of the genome, with DNA elements being the most prevalent (29.37%), followed by LTR retrotransposons (5.55%), long interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs, 4.34%), and short interspersed nuclear elements (SINEs, 0.55%) [104]. Similarly, in the C. mrigala genome, repetitive elements account for 48.20% of the genome, with DNA elements constituting 3.67%, and LTR retrotransposons 2.24% [105]. Based on these studies, it is reasonable to hypothesize that the G. rufa genome is similarly rich in DNA elements and LTR retrotransposons.

To establish the genomic resources for G. rufa, we organized an international consortium that included Mie University, Japan; Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional (BRIN), Indonesia; and the University of Vienna, Austria. This consortium focuses on the construction of a chromosome-level assembly of the G. rufa genome and characterization of its anatomical and physiological uniqueness [106]. The consortium has established an Agreement on Access and Benefit-sharing for Academic Research, and is endeavoring to establish this locally valuable genetic resource as a novel model organism for biomedical research.

Conclusion

This review discusses the current scientific and social information on G. rufa, highlighting its potential as a new model organism for studying human diseases owing to its ability to thrive at human body temperature, an attribute not observed in other widely used fish models. Since human pharmaceuticals are designed to function at human body temperature and microorganisms that infect humans typically thrive best at 37 °C, G. rufa, which also thrives at this temperature, represents a unique advantage as a model for use in biomedical research. Furthermore, the ongoing genome sequencing project for G. rufa holds promise for elucidating the mechanisms underlying its high-temperature tolerance, a trait that sets it apart from other Cyprinidae species. These insights could also contribute to fish aquaculture and species conservation in the context of global warming.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed in the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Yang L, Arunachalam M, Sado T, Levin BA, Golubtsov AS, Freyhof J, et al. Molecular phylogeny of the cyprinid tribe Labeonini (Teleostei: Cypriniformes). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2012;65(2):362–79. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ympev.2012.06.007. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000309636200002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Grassberger M, Hoch W. Ichthyotherapy as alternative treatment for patients with psoriasis: A pilot study. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2006;3(4):483–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/ecam/nel033. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000243072400011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Shih T, Khan S, Shih S, Khachemoune A. Fish Pedicure: Review of Its Current Dermatology Applications. Cureus. 2020;12(6):e8936. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.7759/cureus.8936. (Epub 20200630. PubMed PMID: 32765982; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7398691).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sayili M, Akca H, Duman T, Esengun K. Psoriasis treatment via doctor fishes as part of health tourism: A case study of Kangal Fish Spring Turkey. Tourism Management. 2007;28(2):625–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.tourman.2006.08.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goren M, Galil BS. A review of changes in the fish assemblages of Levantine inland and marine ecosystems following the introduction of non-native fishes. J Appl Ichthyol. 2005;21(4):364–70. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.1439-0426.2005.00674.x. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000231508000020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Glasauer SM, Neuhauss SC. Whole-genome duplication in teleost fishes and its evolutionary consequences. Mol Genet Genomics. 2014;289(6):1045–60. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00438-014-0889-2. (Epub 20140805. PubMed PMID: 25092473).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Van de Peer Y, Maere S, Meyer A. OPINION The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications. Nat Rev Genet. 2009;10(10):725–32. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/nrg2600. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000269965100015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Opazo J, Butts G, Nery M, Storz J, Hoffmann F. Whole-Genome Duplication and the Functional Diversification of Teleost Fish Hemoglobins. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(1):140–53. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/molbev/mss212. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000312888600016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Inoue J, Sato Y, Sinclair R, Tsukamoto K, Nishida M. Rapid genome reshaping by multiple-gene loss after whole-genome duplication in teleost fish suggested by mathematical modeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2015;112(48):14918–23. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1073/pnas.1507669112. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000365988900056).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lieschke GJ, Currie PD. Animal models of human disease: zebrafish swim into view. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8(5):353–67. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/nrg2091. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000245906500015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Howe K, Clark MD, Torroja CF, Torrance J, Berthelot C, Muffato M, et al. The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome. Nature. 2013;496(7446):498–503. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/nature12111. (Epub 2013/04/17. PubMed PMID: 23594743; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3703927).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Gluck JP, Bell J. Ethical issues in the use of animals in biomedical and psychopharmocological research. Psychopharmacology. 2003;171(1):6–12. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00213-003-1478-y. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000186978900002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hwang WY, Fu YF, Reyon D, Maeder ML, Tsai SQ, Sander JD, et al. Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(3):227–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/nbt.2501. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000316439500016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Boutros M, Ahringer J. The art and design of genetic screens: RNA interference. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9(7):554–66. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/nrg2364. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000256832900015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ansai S, Kinoshita M. Targeted mutagenesis using CRISPR/Cas system in medaka. Biology Open. 2014;3(5):362–71. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1242/bio.20148177. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000348068100007).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wittbrodt J, Shima A, Schartl M. Medaka - A model organism from the Far East. Nat Rev Genet. 2002;3(1):53–64. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/nrg704. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000173267200017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Omori Y, Kon T. Goldfish: an old and new model system to study vertebrate development, evolution and human disease. J Biochem. 2019;165(3):209–18. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/jb/mvy076. (PubMed PMID: 30219851).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kon T, Omori Y, Fukuta K, Wada H, Watanabe M, Chen Z, et al. The Genetic Basis of Morphological Diversity in Domesticated Goldfish. Curr Biol. 2020;30(12):2260-74.e6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.cub.2020.04.034. (Epub 20200508. PubMed PMID: 32392470).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kon T, Fukuta K, Chen Z, Kon-Nanjo K, Suzuki K, Ishikawa M, et al. Single-cell transcriptomics of the goldfish retina reveals genetic divergence in the asymmetrically evolved subgenomes after allotetraploidization. Commun Biol. 2022;5(1):1404. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s42003-022-04351-3. (Epub 20221226. PubMed PMID: 36572749; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC9792465).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Norton WHJ, Gutiérrez HC. The three-spined stickleback as a model for behavioural neuroscience. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0213320. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1371/journal.pone.0213320. (Epub 20190326. PubMed PMID: 30913214; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6435232).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Poeschla M, Valenzano DR. The turquoise killifish: a genetically tractable model for the study of aging. J Exp Biol. 2020;223(Pt Suppl 1):jeb209296. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1242/jeb.209296. (Epub 20200207. PubMed PMID: 32034047).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rüber L, Kottelat M, Tan HH, Ng PKL, Britz R. Evolution of miniaturization and the phylogenetic position of Paedocypris, comprising the world’s smallest vertebrate. BMC Evol Biol. 2007;7:38. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/1471-2148-7-38. (PubMed PMID: WOS:000245463000001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang C, Zhang K, Peng Y, Zhou J, Liu Y, Liu B. Novel Gene Rearrangement in the Mitochondrial Genome of Three Garra and Insights Into the Phylogenetic Relationships of Labeoninae. Front Genet. 2022;13:922634. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fgene.2022.922634. (PubMed PMID: 35754812; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC9213810).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang X, Li J, He S. Molecular evidence for the monophyly of East Asian groups of Cyprinidae (Teleostei: Cypriniformes) derived from the nuclear recombination activating gene 2 sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007;42(1):157–70. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.ympev.2006.06.014. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000243644600012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. He S, Liu H, Chen Y, Kuwahara M, Nakajima T, Zhong Y. Molecular phylogenetic relationships of Eastern Asian Cyprinidae (Pisces: Cypriniformes) inferred from cytochrome b sequences. Sci China C-Life Sci. 2004;47(2):130–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1360/03yc0034. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000220726800005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Stout C, Tan M, Lemmon A, Lemmon E, Armbruster J. Resolving Cypriniformes relationships using an anchored enrichment approach. BMC Evol Biol. 2016;16:244. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12862-016-0819-5. (PubMed PMID: WOS:000387727200003).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Tadmor-Levi R, Feldstein-Farkash T, Milstein D, Golani D, Leader N, Goren M, et al. Revisiting the species list of freshwater fish in Israel based on DNA barcoding. Ecol Evol. 2023;13(12):e10812. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/ece3.10812. (PubMed PMID: WOS:001127499600001).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Tadmor-Levi R, Borovski T, Marcos-Hadad E, Shapiro J, Hulata G, Golani D, et al. Establishing and using a genetic database for resolving identification of fish species in the Sea of Galilee, Israel. PLOS ONE. 2022;17(5):e0267021. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1371/journal.pone.0267021. (PubMed PMID: WOS:001016382300016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Awas M, Ahmed I, Ahmad S, Al-Anazi K, Farah M, Bhat B. Integrative approach for validation of six important fish species inhabiting River Poonch of north-west Himalayan region (India). Front Genet. 2023;13:1047436. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fgene.2022.1047436. (PubMed PMID: WOS:000923461400001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Aslan S, Yüksel F, Çoban M. Murat Nehri’ndeki Garra rufa (Heckel, 1843)’nın Bazı Populasyon Parametreleri. YYU J Agr Sci. 2021;31(1):80–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Çelik I, Çelik P, Bariş M, Öğretmen F. Exploring Doctor fish (Garra rufa, Heckel, 1846) breeding: A concise review. Mar Rep. 2023;2(2):145–51.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yedier S, Kontas S, Bostanci D, Polat N. Otolith and scale morphologies of doctor fish (Garra rufa) inhabiting Kangal Balikli Cermik thermal spring (Sivas, Turkey). Iranian J Fish Sci. 2016;15(4):1593–608 (PubMed PMID: WOS:000392389000024).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Teimori A, Esmaeili HR, Ansari TH. Micro-structure Consideration of the Adhesive Organ in Doctor Fish, Garra rufa (Teleostei; Cyprinidae) from the Persian Gulf Basin. Turk J Fish Aquat Sci. 2011;11(3):407–11. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.4194/1303-2712-v11_3_10. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000298836100010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gorshkova G, Gorshkov S, Abu-Ras A, Golani D. Karyotypes of Garra rufa and G-ghorensis (Pisces, Cyprinidae) inhabiting the inland water systems of the Jordan basin. Italian J Zoology. 2012;79(1):9–12. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1080/11250003.2011.600338. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000302150200003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Çiçek E, Seçer B, Öztürk S, Sungur S. Age and Growth of Garra rufa (Heckel, 1843) from Merzimen Stream, Euphrates River Basin Turkey. LimnoFish. 2021;7(1):77–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaya C, Imure HB, Kurtul I. Is Garra rezai (Teleostei, Cyprinidae) a species known only from two widely disjunct areas in the Tigris drainage? Zoosyst Evol. 2024;100(2):349–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Aydın B, Akhan S. An alternative species for aquaculture: Doctor fish (Garra rufa). Agricultural Food Sci Environ Sci. 2020;5(2):199–206.

  38. Makki T, Mostafavi H, Matkan A, Aghighi H. Modelling Climate-Change Impact on the Spatial Distribution of Garra Rufa (Heckel, 1843) (Teleostei: Cyprinidae). Iranian J Sci Technol Transact a-Sci. 2021;45(3):795–804. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s40995-021-01088-2. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000625898100001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Gumgum B, Unlu E, Tez Z, Gulsun Z. Heavy-Metal Pollution in Water, Sediment and Fish from The Tigris River in Turkey. Chemosphere. 1994;29(1):111–6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/0045-6535(94)90094-9. (PubMedPMID:WOS:A1994NZ72500011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yanar M, Erdogan E, Kumlu M. Thermal tolerance of thirteen popular ornamental fish Species. Aquaculture. 2019;501:382–6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.11.041. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000453540800048).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Celik P. The Development of Doctor Fish, Garra rufa (HECKEL, 1843), Lavae and The Effect of Temperature on Their Growth. Fresenius Environ Bull. 2021;30(1):241–9 (PubMed PMID: WOS:000629181200027).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Catarino M, Gomes MRS, Ferreira SMF, Gonçalves SC. Optimization of feeding quantity and frequency to rear the cyprinid fish Garra rufa (Heckel, 1843). Aquac Res. 2019;50(3):876–81. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/are.13961. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000457739000020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Cagatay IT, Aydin B, Aktop Y, Yilmaz HE. Fresenius Environ Bull. 2022;31(5):4759–68 (PubMed PMID: WOS:000790818100012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Civánová K, Koyun M, Koubková B. The molecular and morphometrical description of a new diplozoid species from the gills of the Garra rufa (Heckel, 1843) (Cyprinidae) from Turkey-including a commentary on taxonomic division of Diplozoidae. Parasitol Res. 2013;112(8):3053–62. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00436-013-3480-6. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000322441000032).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Majtán J, Cerny J, Ofúkaná A, Takáč P, Kozánek M. Mortality of therapeutic fish Garra rufa caused by Aeromonas sobria. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2012;2(2):85–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/S2221-1691(11)60197-4. (PubMedPMID:23569873;PubMedCentralPMCID:PMCPMC3609261).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Aydin B, Akhan S, Gümüs E, Özbas M. Anesthetic Efficacy of Clove Oil and 2-Phenoxyethanol on Doctor Fish, Garra rufa (HECKEL, 1843). Boletim Do Instituto De Pesca. 2019;45(4):e506. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.20950/1678-2305.2019.45.4.506.

  47. de Oliveira I, Oliveira R, Lemos C, de Oliveira C, Silva A, Lorenzo V, et al. Essential oils from Cymbopogon citratus and Lippia sidoides in the anesthetic induction and transport of ornamental fish Pterophyllum scalare. Fish Physiol Biochem. 2022;48(3):501–19. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10695-022-01075-3. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000784023700001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kürkçüoğlu N, Oz G. Psoriasis and the doctor fish. Lancet. 1989;2(8676):1394. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91999-5. (PubMed PMID: 2574331).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Undar L, Akpinar MA, Yanikoglu A. “Doctor fish” and psoriasis. Lancet. 1990;335(8687):470–1. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/0140-6736(90)90699-6. (PubMed PMID: 1968187).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Volpe E, Mandrioli L, Errani F, Serratore P, Zavatta E, Rigillo A, et al. Evidence of fish and human pathogens associated with doctor fish (Garra rufa, Heckel, 1843) used for cosmetic treatment. J Fish Dis. 2019;42(12):1637–44. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/jfd.13087. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000488450300001).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Ruane NM, Collins EM, Geary M, Swords D, Hickey C, Geoghegan F. Isolation of Streptococcus agalactiae and an aquatic birnavirus from doctor fish Garra rufa L. Ir Vet J. 2013;66:16. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/2046-0481-66-16. (PubMed PMID: WOS:000324496400001).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Sugimoto K, Frei R, Graber P. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus foot infection after fish pedicure. Infection. 2013;41(5):1013–5. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s15010-013-0437-8. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000324493500015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Vanhooteghem O, Theate I, De Schaetzen V. Periungual Mycobacterium marinum Infection following a Fish Manicure. Skin Appendage Disord. 2021;7(5):393–6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1159/000514853. (Epub 20210413. PubMed PMID: 34604330; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC8436712).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Schets FM, van den Berg HH, de Zwaan R, van Soolingen D, Husman AMD. The microbiological quality of water in fish spas with Garra rufa fish, the Netherlands, October to November 2012. Eurosurveillance. 2015;20(19):2–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2807/1560-7917.es2015.20.19.21124. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000354874900001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sirri R, Zaccaroni A, Di Biase A, Mordenti O, Stancampiano L, Sarli G, et al. Effects of two water disinfectants (chloramine T and peracetic acid) on the epidermis and gills of Garra rufa used in human ichthyotherapy. Pol J Vet Sci. 2013;16(3):453–61. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.2478/pjvs-2013-0063. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000324606200005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Evers HG, Pinnegar JK, Taylor MI. Where are they all from? - sources and sustainability in the ornamental freshwater fish trade. J Fish Biol. 2019;94(6):909–16. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/jfb.13930. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000472976300008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Zhang W, Wang H, Brandt D, Hu B, Sheng J, Wang M, et al. The genetic architecture of phenotypic diversity in the Betta fish (Betta splendens). Sci Adv. 2022;8(38):eabm4955. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1126/sciadv.abm4955. (PubMed PMID: WOS:000885315600001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Toomey M, Marques C, Araújo P, Huang D, Zhong S, Liu Y, et al. A mechanism for red coloration in vertebrates. Curr Biol. 2022;32(19):4201-+. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.cub.2022.08.013. (PubMed PMID: WOS:000898422800001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Fong S, Rogell B, Amcoff M, Kotrschal A, van der Bijl W, Buechel S, et al. Rapid mosaic brain evolution under artificial selection for relative telencephalon size in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Sci Adv. 2021;7(46):eabj4314. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1126/sciadv.abj4314. (PubMed PMID: WOS:000717666900009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Wildgoose WH. A review of fish welfare and public health concerns about the use of Garra rufa in foot spas. Fish Vet J. 2012;13:3–16.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Al Jufaili SM, Adel M, Shekarabi SPH, Copat C, Velisek J. Trace elements in the muscle and liver tissues of Garra shamal from the freshwater ecosystem of Oman: an exposure risk assessment. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2024. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11356-024-32229-w. (PubMedPMID:WOS:001153698600007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Demirci S, Ozdilek SY, Simsek E. Study on Nutrition Characteristics of Garra Rufa on The River Asi. Fresenius Environ Bull. 2016;25(12A):5999–6004 (PubMed PMID: WOS:000392555800045).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Yalçin-Özdilek S, Ekmekçi FG. Preliminary data on the diet of Garra rufa (Cyprinidae) in the Asi basin (Orontes) Turkey. Cybium. 2006;30(2):177–86 (PubMed PMID: WOS:000238606900011).

    Google Scholar 

  64. Sen Özdemir N. What are the most effective biotic and abiotic factors affecting fatty acid composition of Garra rufa (Heckel, 1843)? Grasas Y Aceites. 2023;74(3):e518. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3989/gya.0224221. (PubMed PMID: WOS:001152588300008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Aydin B, Akhan S. Su Ürünleri Yetiştiriciliğinde Alternatif Bir Tür: Doktor Balığı (Garra rufa). Atatürk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi. 2020;51(2):199–206. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.17097/ataunizfd.602530.

  66. Masso-Silva JA, Diamond G. Antimicrobial peptides from fish. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2014;7(3):265–310. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/ph7030265. (Epub 20140303 PubMed PMID: 24594555; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3978493).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Najafian L, Babji AS. A review of fish-derived antioxidant and antimicrobial peptides: Their production, assessment, and applications. Peptides. 2012;33(1):178–85. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.peptides.2011.11.013. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000300073100025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Rajanbabu V, Chen JY. Applications of antimicrobial peptides from fish and perspectives for the future. Peptides. 2011;32(2):415–20. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.peptides.2010.11.005. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000287340000030).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Loewa A, Feng JJ, Hedtrich S. Human disease models in drug development. Nat Rev Bioeng. 2023;1:545–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s44222-023-00063-3

  70. Hunter P. Replacing mammals in drug development Non-mammalian models accelerate translational and pre-clinical research. Embo Rep. 2023;24(1):e56485 (PubMed PMID: WOS:000890244100001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Patton E, Zon L, Langenau D. Zebrafish disease models in drug discovery: from preclinical modelling to clinical trials. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20(8):611–28. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41573-021-00210-8. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000660401500001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. MacRae CA, Peterson RT. Zebrafish as tools for drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015;14(10):721–31. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/nrd4627. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000362191100015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Zon LI, Peterson RT. In vivo drug discovery in the zebrafish. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2005;4(1):35–44. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/nrd1606. (PubMed PMID: 15688071).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Lin CY, Chiang CY, Tsai HJ. Zebrafish and Medaka: new model organisms for modern biomedical research. J Biomed Sci. 2016;23:19. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s12929-016-0236-5. (PubMed PMID: WOS:000368883800002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Schartl M. Beyond the zebrafish: diverse fish species for modeling human disease. Dis Model Mech. 2014;7(2):181–92. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1242/dmm.012245. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000337619300005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Kim Y, Nam HG, Valenzano DR. The short-lived African turquoise killifish: an emerging experimental model for ageing. Dis Model Mech. 2016;9(2):115–29. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1242/dmm.023226. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000371438400004).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Huiting LN, Laroche F, Feng H. The Zebrafish as a Tool to Cancer Drug Discovery. Austin J Pharmacol Ther. 2015;3(2):1069 (Epub 2015/05/04. PubMed PMID: 26835511; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4731041).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Guo S. Linking genes to brain, behavior and neurological diseases: what can we learn from zebrafish? Genes Brain Behav. 2004;3(2):63–74. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1046/j.1601-183X.2003.00053.x. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000220474900001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Liu EG, Zhao XQ, Li CJ, Wang YF, Li LL, Zhu H, et al. Effects of acute heat stress on liver damage, apoptosis and inflammation of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca). J Ther Biol. 2022;106:103251. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.jtherbio.2022.103251. (PubMed PMID: WOS:000804932500001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Roychowdhury P, Aftabuddin M, Pati MK. Thermal stress-induced oxidative damages in the liver and associated death in fish. Labeo rohita Fish Physiology and Biochemistry. 2021;47(1):21–32. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s10695-020-00880-y. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000577227400001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Zhao TT, Ma AJ, Huang ZH, Liu ZF, Sun ZB, Zhu CY, et al. Transcriptome analysis reveals that high temperatures alter modes of lipid metabolism in juvenile turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) liver. Comp Biochem Physiol D-Genomics Proteomics. 2021;40:100887. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.cbd.2021.100887. (PubMed PMID: WOS:000706436600001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Yuan DY, Wang HY, Liu XQ, Wang SY, Shi JF, Cheng XK, et al. High temperature induced metabolic reprogramming and lipid remodeling in a high-altitude fish species Triplophysa bleekeri. Front Marine Sci. 2022;9:1017142. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmars.2022.1017142. (PubMed PMID: WOS:000879057900001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Lee D, Kim KH, Park JW, Lee JH, Kim JH. High water temperature-mediated immune gene expression of olive flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus according to pre-stimulation at high temperatures. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2023;101:104159. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.etap.2023.104159. (PubMed PMID: WOS:001026592800001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Scharsack JP, Franke F. Temperature effects on teleost immunity in the light of climate change. J Fish Biol. 2022;101(4):780–96. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/jfb.15163. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000850492800001).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. White RM, Sessa A, Burke C, Bowman T, LeBlanc J, Ceol C, et al. Transparent adult zebrafish as a tool for in vivo transplantation analysis. Cell Stem Cell. 2008;2(2):183–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.stem.2007.11.002. (Epub 2008/03/29. PubMed PMID: 18371439; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2292119).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Zhao C, Wang X, Zhao Y, Li Z, Lin S, Wei Y, et al. A novel xenograft model in zebrafish for high-resolution investigating dynamics of neovascularization in tumors. PLoS One. 2011;6(7):e21768. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1371/journal.pone.0021768. (Epub 2011/07/13. PubMed PMID: 21765912; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3135597).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Shimada Y, Nishimura Y, Tanaka T. Zebrafish-based systems pharmacology of cancer metastasis. Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1165:223–38. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/978-1-4939-0856-1_15. (PubMed PMID: 24839028).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Zhao S, Huang J, Ye J. A fresh look at zebrafish from the perspective of cancer research. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2015;34:80. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13046-015-0196-8. (PubMed PMID: WOS:000359470800001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Torraca V, Mostowy S. Zebrafish Infection: From Pathogenesis to Cell Biology. Trends Cell Biol. 2018;28(2):143–56. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.tcb.2017.10.002. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000424633500006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  90. Sofyantoro F, Priyono D, Septriani N, Putri W, Mamada S, Ramadaningrum W, et al. Zebrafish as a model organism for virus disease research: Current status and future directions. Heliyon. 2024;10(13):e33865. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33865. (PubMed PMID: WOS:001266704900001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Gomes M, Mostowy S. The Case for Modeling Human Infection in Zebrafish. Trends Microbiol. 2020;28(1):10–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.tim.2019.08.005. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000503037700005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Dirks RP, Ordas A, Jong-Raadsen S, Brittijn SA, Haks MC, Henkel CV, et al. The Human Pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the Fish Pathogen Mycobacterium marinum Trigger a Core Set of Late Innate Immune Response Genes in Zebrafish Larvae. Biology (Basel). 2024;13(9):688. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/biology13090688. (Epub 20240903. PubMed PMID: 39336115; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC11429319).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Ray EJ, Butler JM, Maruska KP. Neural activation patterns associated with mouthbrooding, maternal care, infanticide and fry release in an African cichlid fish. J Exp Biol. 2023;226(6):244854. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1242/jeb.244854. (PubMed PMID: WOS:000974978300008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Rice ES, Green RE. New Approaches for Genome Assembly and Scaffolding. Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2019;7:17–40. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1146/annurev-animal-020518-115344. (Epub 20181128. PubMed PMID: 30485757).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Putnam N, O’Connell B, Stites J, Rice B, Blanchette M, Calef R, et al. Chromosome-scale shotgun assembly using an in vitro method for long-range linkage. Genome Res. 2016;26(3):342–50. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1101/gr.193474.115. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000371373900006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Zeng X, Yi Z, Zhang X, Du Y, Li Y, Zhou Z, et al. Chromosome-level scaffolding of haplotype-resolved assemblies using Hi-C data without reference genomes. Nat Plants. 2024;10(8):1184–200. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41477-024-01755-3. (PubMed PMID: WOS:001285975100002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Korbel J, Lee C. Genome assembly and haplotyping with Hi-C. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(12):1099–101. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/nbt.2764. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000328251900022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Burton J, Adey A, Patwardhan R, Qiu R, Kitzman J, Shendure J. Chromosome-scale scaffolding of de novo genome assemblies based on chromatin interactions. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31(12):1119-+. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/nbt.2727. (PubMed PMID: WOS:000328251900025).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Kon-Nanjo K, Kon T, Yu T, Rodriguez-Terrones D, Falcon F, Martínez D, et al. The dynamic genomes of Hydra and the anciently active repeat complement of animal chromosomes. bioRxiv. 2024;2024.03.13.584568. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1101/2024.03.13.584568.

  100. Senft A, Macfarlan T. Transposable elements shape the evolution of mammalian development. Nat Rev Genet. 2021;22(11):691–711. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41576-021-00385-1. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000681564000001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Bourque G, Burns K, Gehring M, Gorbunova V, Seluanov A, Hammell M, et al. Ten things you should know about transposable elements. Genome Biol. 2018;19:199. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s13059-018-1577-z. (PubMed PMID: WOS:000451147300001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Feschotte C. Opinion - Transposable elements and the evolution of regulatory networks. Nat Rev Genet. 2008;9(5):397–405. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/nrg2337. (PubMedPMID:WOS:000255057300015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Arick M, Grover C, Hsu C, Magbanua Z, Pechanova O, Miller E, et al. A high-quality chromosome-level genome assembly of rohu carp, Labeo rohita, and its utilization in SNP-based exploration of gene flow and sex determination. G3 (Bethesda). 2023;13(3):jkad009. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/g3journal/jkad009.

  104. Liu H, Cui T, Liu H, Zhang J, Luo Q, Fei S, et al. Chromosome-level genome assembly of the mud carp (Cirrhinus molitorella) using PacBio HiFi and Hi-C sequencing. Sci Data. 2024;11(1):1249. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41597-024-04075-5. (PubMed PMID: WOS:001359103700003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Chowdhury L, Mohindra V, Kumar R, Jena J. Genome sequencing and assembly of Indian major carp, Cirrhinus mrigala (Hamilton, 1822). Sci Data. 2024;11(1):898. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41597-024-03747-6. (PubMed PMID: WOS:001292888400006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  106. Shimada Y, Handayani S, Kon-Nanjo K, Gultom V, Simakov O, Fahrurrozi, et al. Establishing Garra rufa as a novel cyprinid model for human disease with high-temperature tolerance. 18th International Zebrafish Conference; Kyoto 2024;3P–970

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Ms. Kyoko Shimada at Mie University and Dr. Herbert Gasser at the University of Vienna for their continuous support in organizing this study.

Funding

This work was supported by the Okasan-Katoh Foundation and Takahashi Industrial, Economic Research Foundation and JSPS KAKENHI (grant number 24K21914) to YS, Takeda Science Foundation to TK, Mochida Memorial Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research to TK, International Medical Research Foundation to TK, Yamada Science Foundation to TK, Austrian Science Fund FWF (I4353), and ERC-H2020-EURIP grant (grant number 945026) to OS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.S. and T.K. conceived and planned the review. B.A. wrote "1. Introduction" and "3) Traits of G. rufa". K.SH., VD.G. and F. wrote "4. Conventional roles of G. rufa in human society K.KN., T.K., and O.S. wrote "2. Phylogenetic relationship between G. rufa and other small teleost fish" and "5. The emerging role of G. rufa in human healthcare and medical research Y.S. took the lead in writing and both Y.S. and T.K. contributed to the final version of the manuscript. T.K. supervised the project.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yasuhito Shimada.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shimada, Y., Aydın, B., Kon-Nanjo, K. et al. Potential of Garra rufa as a novel high-temperature resistant model fish: a review on current and future approaches. Zoological Lett 11, 3 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40851-025-00249-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40851-025-00249-0

Keywords